Douglas Roberts wrote:
http://www.google.com/search?q=NIF+lanl+the+rest+of+the+story&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=com.ubuntu:en-US:unofficial&client=firefox-a
<http://www.google.com/search?q=NIF+lanl+the+rest+of+the+story&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=com.ubuntu:en-US:unofficial&client=firefox-a>
Skimmed over Bodner's article where he talks about them having trouble
getting to 0.5x0.5 mm focal spot, but then in Table 2 their data says
250 um focal spot at 1.8 MJ "Demonstrated to date". Seems like a lot
of the misrepresentation he's concerned about is now historical?
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
