Interesting, but I noted a number of omissions: - 387 is labelled "???" but should be labelled "smallest non-special number" - 391 is labelled "???" but should be labelled "smallest non-special number" - 415 is labelled "???" but should be labelled "smallest non-special number" - 424 is labelled "???" but should be labelled "smallest non-special number" - etc.
-- Robert On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Owen Densmore <[email protected]> wrote: > A friend points out a nifty numeric site: > -- Owen > > Begin forwarded message: > > *Date: *July 20, 2009 9:34:37 AM MDT > *Subject: **What's Special About This Number?* > > http://www2.stetson.edu/~efriedma/numbers.html > > > ============================================================ > FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv > Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College > lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org >
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
