So... at what point does the reductionism end? Or, more specifically, at what
point do we decide that the degree of reductionism is just getting silly? 

It used to be a mind-boggling claim that "I" was my brain (note: mind-boggling,
not brain-boggling). Recently, the "brain in a vat" paradox has more or less
replaced Plato's cave, where the original clearly required an entire, bodily
"I" for the story to work. Now we are dissatisfied again, apparently because we
find "I = my brain" to be too holistic for our tastes? Now we try to determine
the minimal specifiable number of brain parts that need to be in the vat? 
Then, apparently, we are surprised to find out that it is hard to specify? Who
really thinks that one day we will find the quarter-inch square in the brain
where "I" resides? Is it really any better to look for a small cluster of
dispersed neurons? Can it improve anything to say that it isn't the cluster,
but a process that occurs within the cluster? 

Bah! A pox on both your... something... not houses... but something. 

Eric


On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 12:10 PM, "Robert Howard" <[email protected]> 
wrote:
>


v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}



st1\:*{behavior:url(#default#ieooui) }


 

 
  
 


>

>


>
>We
are a “strange loop”...
>
>






>
>
>
> 






>
>
>
> 






>
>I
Think   -->   therefore   -->  I Am   ---
>
>






>
>^                    
                     |
>
>






>
>|                    
                     |
>
>






>
>|                    
                     |
>
>






>
> ------------------------------------------
>
>






>
>
>
> 






>
>
>
> 






>
>Rob
Howard
>
>






>
>
>
> 







>

>




>
>From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Victoria Hughes
>Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009
8:46 PM
>To: The
 Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
>Subject: [FRIAM] not a place but a
process-


>
>


>
>






>
>
>
> 






>
>The self feels like a singular thing - I am me - and
yet it comes from no single brain area and depends on a vast network of
neurons, distributed across the brain. This means that we are not a place: we
are a process. As Daniel Dennett wrote, our mind is made up "of multiple
channels in which specialist circuits try, in parallel pandemoniums, to do
their various things, creating Multiple Drafts as they go."


>
>


>
>



>


>
>
>
> 







>


>
>From  <http://scienceblogs.com/cortex/2009/08/identity_delusions.php>


>
>


>
>





>


>
>
>
> 







>


>
>
>
> 







>


>
>Tory
>
>








>




============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Reply via email to