Grant,

You have certainly chosen a fascinating and challenging topic --I'm looking 
forward to seeing the completed paper.
I'm a retired mathematician who works in category theory. Recently I have been 
applying categories to dynamical systems. I have no idea about how to handle a 
dynamical system that would involve some real evolution of life-like systems, 
but I'm open to any thoughts about this.

--John
________________________________________
From: [email protected] [[email protected]] On Behalf Of Grant 
Holland [[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 6:00 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Hello, FRIAM

Jochen,

Hello! Thanks for responding. I like your answer, and I also agree.

And...I'm actually looking for an answer with the equivalent semantics,
but with a more actionable articulation. For now, I've actually found
one that I like - and made a theory out of it. :-)

And, No, I'm not related to John Holland. However, my first name is also
"John" - but I go by my middle name. So I'm John G. Holland, and He's
(should I use a capital "H?) John H. Holland. We also have another
difference: He claims he cannot define "emergence" satisfactorily; but I
claim I can!

And I like your quotes from von Neumann. About errors - we all know that
without DNA copy errors, there would be no species adaptation and no
evolution. So that's another difference: for living systems, errors can
be a salvation; for engineered systems they are almost always a problem
to be eliminated.

Take care, and thanks for the welcome email!
Grant

Jochen Fromm wrote:
> Hello Grant,
>
> welcome! Are you related to John H. Holland? You asked an interesting
> question: "Why is the organization and dynamics of living systems so
> different from those of 'engineered' ones - and why are their systemic
> properties so much more interesting?" I would say because living
> systems are selfish and adaptive, they face the problem of survival
> every single day, while engineered
> systems are dumb and brittle, they do only what they are programmed to
> do, and nothing else.
>
> John von Neuman (1903-1957) said
> "It's very likely that on the basis of the philosophy that every error
> has to be caught, explained, and corrected, a system of the complexity
> of the living organism would not run for a millisecond."
> He argued that living systems are fault-tolerant because they can
> adapt themselves to errors and
> changing conditions:
>
> "The system is sufficiently flexible and well organized that as soon
> as an error shows up in any part of it, the system automatically
> senses whether this error matters or not. If it doesn't matter, the
> system continues to operate without paying any attention to it. If the
> error seems to the system to be important, the system blocks that
> region out, by-passes it, and proceeds along other channels. [...] The
> duration of operability is determined by the time it takes until so
> many incurable errors have occurred, so many alterations and permanent
> by-passes have been made, that finally the operability is really
> impaired."
> And he argued that the fundamental difference in the
> architecture is the ability to (re-)organize itself:
>
> "The fact that natural organisms have such a radically different
> attitude about errors and behave so differently when an error occurs
> is probably connected with some other traits of natural organisms
> [...] The ability of a natural organism to survive in spite of a high
> incidence of error probably requires a very high flexibility and
> ability of the automaton to watch itself and reorganize itself."
> Life is an exceptional state characterized by self-* properties:
> self-reproduction, self-replication,
> and self-maintenance, in short self-organization. When it comes to
> large-scale computing systems - think of Google or Amazon - you can
> discover many of these self-* properties again. They have
> self-healing, self-monitoring and self-configuring systems. Therefore
> living systems and  large-scale computing systems may not be that
> different at all, they both require self-* properties,
> which are inevitable if you want to build really large systems that work.
>
> Good luck with your paper,
> Jochen
> http://blog.cas-group.net/
>
> ( Quotes are from: John von Neumann, "Theory and Organization of
> Complicated Automata", 4th Lecture "The Role of High and Extremely
> High Complication" in John von Neumann on Computing and Computer
> Theory, Vol. 12 in the Charles Babbage Institute, Reprint Series for
> the History of Computing
> Edited by William Aspray and Arthur Burks,
> The MIT Press, 1987 )
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Grant Holland"
> <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 8:06 PM
> Subject: [FRIAM] Hello, FRIAM
>
>
>> Dear FRIAM...
>>
>> I'm excited and happy to subscribe to the group. (Thanks for the
>> invite Stephen, - and David.) For many years I have architected and
>> implemented large-scale (mostly Java) enterprise software
>> (applications and systems) for corporations and gov. institutions
>> mostly in North America on behalf of a number of major computer
>> systems vendors (e.g. Sun). However, for the past few years, my
>> passion has turned to the question "Why is the organization and
>> dynamics of living systems so different from those of 'engineered'
>> ones - and why are their systemic properties so much more
>> interesting?" From a practical perspective, I hoped to improve the
>> engineering of large-scale computing systems from this research; but
>> in reality I became fascinated with the theory, and so I had to
>> (lovingly) read lots of books and research articles.
>>
>> Anyway, to drive toward an answer to above question, I have developed
>> a mathematical theory of living and lifelike systems, which I call
>> "Organic Complex Systems". A few months ago I began to write up an
>> overview of the results of my research so far. I am nearing
>> completion of that paper, and intend to publish it on arXiv.org in a
>> couple of months with the hope of getting comments, and hopefully
>> collaborators. BTW, perhaps somewhat more descriptive of this work is
>> the subtitle of this forthcoming paper: "A Comprehensive Theoretical
>> Apparatus for Modelling the Organization and Dynamics of Living and
>> Lifelike Systems".
>>
>> Anyway, these are my immediate interests. I'm looking forward to
>> finding out about yours.
>>
>> Take care,
>> Grant
>>
>> ============================================================
>> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
>> lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
>
> ============================================================
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Reply via email to