Eric, 

 

Based on my own experience with my own expertise, I offer the following 
understanding of what has happened on the list:

 

(1)     There is an elementary explanation of this phenomenon. 

(2)    The speakers are enormously well-educated individuals who once knew that 
explanation. 

(3)     They have forgotten it!

 

Nick 

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
ERIC P. CHARLES
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 1:17 AM
To: Owen Densmore
Cc: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Experiment and Interpretation

 

This conversation has been fascinating. I cannot help but think that various 
poster's instructions to those interested - that those interested need several 
years of graduate study, etc. - are clearly a cop out. It is possible that I 
missed some crucial step of the conversation somewhere, but I this feeling is 
persistent because of how straightforward Nick's question was. 

As complex as psychology is, if you asked me why a rat in a Skinner box pressed 
a leaver 20 times in a minute, I could give you a pretty straightforward and 
understandable-by-the-layman answer. I could also give you a ridiculously 
complicated and jargon riddled answer, or I could tell you that it takes 10 
years of study to even understand the question. All three responses would be 
true. 

As I understand Nick's question, he pointed out a seeming contradiction in a 
relatively simple and mundane phenomenon; or at least, a ridiculously common 
phenomenon at our bigger-than-a-pinhead, smaller-than-a-house physical scale. I 
read the initial start of this (series of) thread(s) roughly as follows: 1) 
There is a system that seems like it is doing X efficiently, and its doing X is 
a very reasonable explanation for the intrinsic-formation of the system. Hence, 
they system seems straightforward. However, 2) some simple experiments seem to 
indicated that the system is not doing X! 3) Why then does the system form and 
remain stable?

In its generic form, this seems like one of the most basic types of questions 
that face anyone doing systems work. Here, the system is a whirlpool, and "X" 
is dissipating-energy-by-moving-water-more-efficiently-down-the-drain (i.e., 
towards the center of the earth).  Nick offered a simple experiment, the point 
of which was to cast skepticism on whether the whirlpool really increases the 
rate of water falling. This led to the question of why the system would form 
and remain, for the most part, stable. The issue was phrased, at least 
initially, as a quest for the gradient being dissipated, or at least the energy 
being done away with. 

While I recognize that this is not the type of question I would necessarily 
expect a high school physics teacher to know off the top of their head, it is 
also not the type of question I would expect to lead to this level of hand 
wringing and rationalization. --- Yes, there is clearly a very complex answer 
that could be given, expressed in the specialized jargon of specific physical 
disciplines, and draped in some nasty, nasty math. However, the fact that some 
clear answer has not been given leads me to believe, barring further evidence, 
that this is a phenomenon that remains poorly understood. At the least, it is 
not understood well enough to be explained simply, which is a pretty good 
criterion for judging how well a thing is understood.

One reason I enjoy this list is because it has well-educated people explaining 
their work to other well-educated people. No one has requested an explanation 
they could tell their grandmother, or their 4 year old child. Sometimes the 
explanations offered on the list work and sometimes they do not, typically they 
work for some people but not others. I'm not sure why people are suddenly 
hiding behind the difficulty of explaining the phenomenon. 

Eric

P.S. Damn, if I missed some posts some where, this email will be ridiculously 
embarrassing.  



============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Reply via email to