I'm curious to know what the "philosophy is very different from science" camp thinks of this paper:
http://phil.elte.hu/leszabo/Preprints/MG-LESz-rp_preprint-v5.pdf It's not a rhetorical question. I don't understand that paper or the physics or math being discussed ... at least not to my satisfaction. But it would be interesting to use the contents of this paper to find out _why_ you think philosophy is so different from so much of what we (perhaps mistakenly) call "science". -- glen e. p. ropella, 971-222-9095, http://tempusdictum.com ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
