The speed of light is relative, apparently. Actually, I'm betting on measurement error. As was pointed out on Slashdot, it would only take a few centimeters of wire not properly taken into account to cause this apparent result.
--Doug On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 6:21 PM, Owen Densmore <[email protected]> wrote: > So the speed of light differs depending on medium, right? Is this also > true for neutrinos? If so, change in materials in the path could possibly > make a difference. The study was through the earth, not via conduits. > > Sounds like a question for Howel White tomorrow! > > -- Owen > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Douglas Roberts <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Of that you can be absolutely sure. >> >> --Doug >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Tom Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Sigh. I guess there really are NO absolutes in this universe of ours. >>> >>> >>> http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/09/22/science-light-idUSL5E7KM4CW20110922 >>> >>> >>> -tj >>> >>> >>> >> ============================================================ >> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv >> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College >> lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org >> > > > ============================================================ > FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv > Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College > lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org > -- Doug Roberts [email protected] [email protected] http://parrot-farm.net/Second-Cousins <http://parrot-farm.net/Second-Cousins> 505-455-7333 - Office 505-670-8195 - Cell
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
