Hi, Eric, 

 

I agree that using the term signal to describe “anything that happens” or term 
“information” to describe “anything related to anything that happens” is bad 
form.  

 

But who did that?  Certainly not Bruce.  

 

When you (eric)  wrote 


Why would you want to take that perfectly good explanation and insert things 
like "The bottom part of the slinky doesn't know to move until it gets 
information indicating that the top part is falling." The idea that you enhance 
the physical description of the slinky by anthropomorphizing it in that way is 
weird

 

Who were you quoting?  I know people who talk like that.  But the “you” was a 
“one-you” not a “you-you”, right?

 

And what about hero Gibson’s use of the term?  Doesn’t he refer to “information 
pickup” as if the physical relation between two thing constitutes knowledge 
about the one provided by the other?  

 

I haven’t looked at the videos yet. 

 

Nick 

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
ERIC P. CHARLES
Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2011 9:44 PM
To: Bruce Sherwood
Cc: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Droping a Slinky (Q&A)

 

Bruce says:
Until the ("sound" or "mechanical") wave in the slinky propagates down to lower 
parts of the hanging slinky, there is no reason/cause for the lower parts of 
the slinky to change position, and they don't. And as long as the lower parts 
of the slinky are stretched, they will continue to support the load below them 
just as they had been doing before the top of the slinky was released. Hence 
the bottom of the slinky will not move until the wave has propagated down far 
enough that the slinky just above the bottom is no longer stretched. 

I says: 
Yes, exactly! 
Why would you want to take that perfectly good explanation and insert things 
like "The bottom part of the slinky doesn't know to move until it gets 
information indicating that the top part is falling." The idea that you enhance 
the physical description of the slinky by anthropomorphizing it in that way is 
weird. (Note, this clearly isn't a Shannon 'information' thing either... at 
least not as far as I can tell. I cannot see anything analogous to a decision 
being made after a clarification of uncertainty. There is no analog to signal 
and noise.) 

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Reply via email to