Everybody, 

 

Anybody who studies the history of the American south is led to wonder why
the many non-slaveholders in the south were led to defend slavery with such
ferocity.  (The inability of a population to see and act on its own best
interest is not a new phenomenon)  So why did  we in the middle class been
so stalwart in our defense of wall street for the last 40 years?

 

The answer, it seems to me, is that we are all stockholders.   I am a member
of a pension plan for academics called TIAA-CREF.  Why the hyphen?  Because
it started as a pension plan, TIAA, with a partially defined benefit;
sometime along the way it added a stock fund, CREF.  CREF had no defined
benefit, but it tracked the SandP very closely.  You could decide, whether
you wanted to put your money in a place with a certain outcome, or whether
you wanted to gamble it.   We were advised to start out in CREF and shift
our investment over to TIAA as we got older.  But many of us forgot to make
the shift and got SCREWED in the .com bust. Over the years CREF, which
started out as a sturdy conservative fund,  became a "family of funds", and
you could invest your retirement money in any crap you felt like.  In short,
many academics lost a large proportion of their retirement.  

 

Thus, the gradual erosion of our retirement institutions in the 50's into
INVESTMENT institutions has turned us all from people trying to guarantee a
minimum dignified retirement income to people trying to make a stock-market
killing.   I am as guilty as anybody else.  I could go out tomorrow and buy
an annuity that would pay most of my last salary, inflation adjusted, for
the rest of my life.  But there is no upside!  Something in me is unwilling
to give up the upside for the safety of avoiding the downside.  

 

So, even though I am solidly in the middle of the 99%, I  have the
psychology of the one percent.  I am coopted.  As Pogo used to say, "We have
seen the enemy, and they is us!"  (Does anybody on this list even KNOW who
Pogo was?)

 

I wonder what would happen to Wall Street if every one of us who has a
pension took the annuity option.  The market would crash in a day, right?  

 

Don't all rush for the door at once!

 

Nick 

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Owen Densmore
Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2011 9:56 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Next Dictator

 

On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Alfredo Covaleda
<[email protected]> wrote:


After Gadaffi's death a local newspaper wrote : "who is going to be the next
dictator to fall?".  Well, my answer is: Wall Street.

-- 
Alfredo

 

I certainly agree with the sentiment.  And I do believe the core signal in
our noise is the lack of a robust middle class, thus I find very troubling
the divide between the wealthy and the "rest of us" and our immense struggle
just to get by nowadays.

 

But I don't think the problem is wall street per se.  After all, wall street
funds companies who build things that are useful.

 

I think the problems are 1) in the financial sector 2) caused by
too-big-to-fail, including monopolies.

 

The financial sector is "different".  It makes money by manipulating money.
Sometimes that's fine, for example futures markets help stabilize the price
of components of products we buy.  Hedge is not a bad word here. Even
lending is important when it too relates to real things like houses and
companies building products.

 

I think the disconnect is when real products and people are abstracted out
of the financial world, when we're building bundles of loans, slicing and
dicing, and nothing real in sight.  Or when we are trading in currencies.

 

Big is different too, distorting markets and dangerous if they fail.

 

As much as we hate them, regulations are important.  But they are very hard
to manage, and with the global economy, they need to be balanced world wide.
And we don't really know which ones will really build the right incentives.


 

We have, however, just learned by experiments gone wrong, that letting banks
also be insurers is a mistake.  And that banks and companies are too large,
they distort the economy, and worse, need rescuing when they err.

 

So yes, let the financial dictator fail next.  Now lets figure out how!

 

        -- Owen

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Reply via email to