On 11/30/11 2:01 PM, Roger Critchlow wrote:
And every time you fix something in the data prep all your carefully
chosen names go down the tubes with whatever amazing theories you
attached to them.
If you have "dust" and "sucker" and get the nameless integer 944 for the
combination, make (Dust,Sucker) or the fissionable "dust/sucker" rather
than agonizing over the possibility of "staubsauger" or "vacuum".
There must be more to this question?
Marcus
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
