I thought that was interesting, since "beholds" took me the longest to figure
out as well. It seems this is partly because the phrase "beholds with pain" is
somewhat archaic and so the context was harder to see, which is largely how we
sort out and make sense of the gibberish, it seems. When I figured out
"beholds" I just used a basic resorting of letters methods to determine the
word rather than reasoning by context. Even when I realized the word must be
"beholds", I did a double take to make sense of the phrase.
From: Rich Murray
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2012 7:31 PM
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] YES
beholds
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Nicholas Thompson
<[email protected]> wrote:
Daer Gerg Sflonenend,
I gesus I hvae azielrithims after all.
I nveer frugeid out waht “bdelohs” wrer.
Nailchos Tamshpoon
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Greg Sonnenfeld
Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2012 6:07 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] YES
The fox who lnoegd for grpaes, bdelohs wtih pian
The tpimetng cutelsrs wree too hgih to gian ;
Gierved in his haret he fcored a clreseas slmie,
And cierd , They are srahp and hlrday wotrh my wlhie .
;-)
****************************
Greg Sonnenfeld
“The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane
to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite insane.”
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
