HI Owen,

My wife and I (she teaches Renaissance English and is definitely a
Humanities person) are "taking" the course together.  My Google+ comments are
here <http://goo.gl/aGjeV> and
here<https://plus.google.com/u/0/114865618166480775623/posts/WBmyR69MsCF>.
I'm not certain what the structure of the course is. The lectures all seem
to be uploaded, but I haven't seen anything about a timeline, exercises,
tests, or any other structure for the course. Do you know anything about
that?

*-- Russ Abbott*
*_____________________________________________*
***  Professor, Computer Science*
*  California State University, Los Angeles*

*  Google voice: 747-*999-5105
  Google+: https://plus.google.com/114865618166480775623/
*  vita:  *http://sites.google.com/site/russabbott/
*_____________________________________________*



On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Owen Densmore <[email protected]> wrote:

> The Stanford Modeling Class has started, I thought I'd give a summary of
> what's up so far.  The website is: https://www.coursera.org/modelthinking/
>
> First of all, this is NOT a deep dive into exotic techniques.  Rather it
> is a *very* broad overview of modeling, answering the question "why model".
>  With each discussion point Scott gives concrete examples, but without
> having to write code or "do the math".
>
> The name of the class, Model Thinking, captures this difference: he is
> guiding us through a new way of thinking that is precise and relatively
> well understood by now.
>
> So it is much more a very high level view of modeling (mainly Agent Based
> Modeling but also simple mathematical and graphical models) with the
> emphasis on very clear thinking.
>
> One quick example: Aggregation.  This is the reductionist dilemma.  How do
> you either
>
> 1 - Look at a Macro event and deduce its parts, or
> 2 - Look at simple Micro rules and deduce the results.
>
> Water, a micro molecule and a macro substance.  The molecule cannot be
> "wet".  Or Schelling's segregation model: at the micro level, individuals
> are quite tolerant, wanting only a few like neighbors, yet the result is a
> surprising large value of segregation.  He also introduces a metric for
> segregation, The Dissimilarity Index, so we can be precise.  He also looks
> at the Game of Life and CA's in a similar way.
>
> Unlike the Machine Learning class, there are readings, generally classics
> in the field.  The first session's readings, for example, are Josh
> Epstein's "Why Model" and Scott's introduction to his class.  Both are very
> "humanities" over "computation".
>
> I've uploaded my class notes, 2 2/3 sets thus far: they are screen
> captures with pdf annotations.  You can get a feel for the class quickly by
> thumbing through them.  They are at http://backspaces.net/temp/ and begin
> with ModelThinking.
>
> I do have to confess: there is a method in my madness in writing this
> email.  I find learning in a cave, by myself, less fun than having some
> others along for the ride.  So if anyone does take the bait .. and ends up
> following the class, lets get together and chat about it. And don't feel
> you have to be a Scientist or Mathematician or Hacker .. you don't.
>
>    -- Owen
>
> ============================================================
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
>
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Reply via email to