Owen, haven't sold enough via Kindle to tell. I was stunned--somebody informed 
me on FB--that Machines Who Think sells for thirty bucks on Kindle! That seems 
to me a good way of making sure none gets sold.

> 
> Pamela: some of your books come in Kindle versions.  Do you have any insights 
> about whether or not digital books work out well for the authors?  Has it 
> hurt, for example, via piracy?
> 
>    -- Owen
> 
> Slightly off-topic: in the science and math journals, there is a serious 
> effort to move away from the huge publishers, especially Elsevier and its 
> very large number of journals they've quietly acquired over the last decade 
> or two.  This is succeeding, even to the point of peer reviews being managed 
> by the coop, not the publisher.
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Owen Densmore <[email protected]>
> Date: Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:02 AM
> Subject: Elsevier — my part in its downfall « Gowers's Weblog
> To: Complexity Coffee Group <[email protected]>
> 
> 
> Timothy Gowers the Fields medalist mathematician has a recent post on 
> Elsevier and a growing movement to boycott their use
> http://gowers.wordpress.com/2012/01/21/elsevier-my-part-in-its-downfall/
> 
> This includes not submitting to the VERY MANY math journals owned by 
> Elsevier: 
> http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/P11.cws_home/mathjournals
> .. or reviewing submissions 
> 
> One previous successful act against Elsevier was extraction of the Journal of 
> Topology 
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topology_(journal)
> On 10 August 2006, after months of unsuccessful negotiations with Elsevier 
> about the price policy of library subscriptions, the entire editorial board 
> of the journal handed in their resignation, with effect from 31 December 
> 2006. Subsequently, two more issues appeared in 2007 with papers that had 
> been accepted before the resignation of the editors. In early January the 
> former editors instructed Elsevier to remove their names from the website of 
> the journal, but Elsevier refused to comply, justifying their decision by 
> saying that the editorial board should remain on the journal until all of the 
> papers accepted during its tenure had been published.
> In 2007 the former editors announced the launch of the Journal of Topology, 
> run under the auspices of the London Mathematical Society at a significantly 
> lower price.
> 
> Its interesting that Timothy also refers to SOPA/PIPA and took part in the 
> wikipedia led protest.  (I just found out that wordpress made a plugin that 
> folks all could use for that and future protests.  Impressive!)
> 
> I'd really like more of us to be careful about our papers and demand they be 
> open.  Its not exactly black/white, but certainly the papers have to be 
> publicly available, whatever else the publisher's rights may be.
> 
> I'd like your opinions, which are quite likely more informed than mine.
> 
>    -- Owen 
> 
> ============================================================
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

"She instructed me as if out of bitter personal experience; she brooded along 
the edges of my childhood like someone living out a long Tennysonian regret."

        Wallace Stegner, "Angle of Repose"

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Reply via email to