I don't get why this is an igNobel. The researchers are showing that the standard statistical tests used in fMRI studies give nonsensical results (namely, the dead salmon "showed active voxel clusters in the salmon’s brain cavity and spinal column"). In contrast, when they use their proposed correction, it didn't.
Showing that the statistical methodology of an entire field is fundamentally flawed is a big deal. And given that this field is making its appearance in courtrooms ( http://www.nature.com/news/2010/100317/full/464340a.html) it is a *very* big deal. —R On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Roger Critchlow <[email protected]> wrote: > Like a smell in your refrigerator that won't go away, the fMRI study of > empathy in dead salmon, http://www.jsur.org/v1n1p1, has resurfaced again > to claim the 2012 igNobel prize for neuroscience. > > -- rec -- > > ============================================================ > FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv > Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College > lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org >
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
