NIck-

Just to tie two threads together (why not after all?), I'm just now reading Russell's paper as produced for us by Owen, and I'm left with the niggling feeling that they have a strong theoretical connection between your (quoting Doug here) Big, Bold, Naive Question (implied if not stated, "why can't I read my old e-mail?") and Complexity (the nominal topic of this group?).

Your hard drive on your _Rainbow in the Attic_ (there's a title for a book in itself!) contains a bit string (not all that long compared to today's hard drive sizes) that has a certain amount of information. Assuming no physical/magnetic damage to the platter(s) the problem of extracting the information is "context", roughly in the same sense as Russell's (in response to Kolmogorov Complexity measures and the paradox produced by the Invariance Theorem). Since nominally your mail is in clear ASCII text with (probably) even ASCII text headers/wrappers/indices/etc. then *most* of the context is already known (guessable/verifiable).

Mind you, I'm not offering to go dig out your mail for you, as I would have done the same from one or another of my own _Digital Fossils in the Basement_ (second in the series of books you just inspired). I'm just introspecting (extrospecting, speculating out loud, expectorating?) about the tie in and the possible reality of your point about "some industry develop sometime of recovering old ..." coming true.

It seems quite possible that the biggest hurdle will the physical/electronic/magnetic extraction, just as OCR problems went from optical and algorithmic limits to "how fast and accurately can you turn a page, load a book, pull a book from a shelf?" I got to see a prototype of what *had to be* a pneumatic driven, high speed book reader that was built for Google (Books?) by colleagues of mine (who were under non-disclosure) and came to appreciate this particular reality (so many books, so little time).

Maybe there will be an electromagnetic version of the relatively inexpensive laser scanners of today (NextEngine) or DIY Structured Light (ala Ambient Pixel) which can pull bits right off of platters without spinning them up or removing them from their spindles and cases... at which point the problem becomes a bit like OCR and the same kind of "semantic" error correction that is helping Google Voice and I assume Google Books to handle low fidelity data and/or recognize format/indexing information (like chapter and heading titles, page numbers, etc.)

This all ties back to the work I'm (re)discovering by our own Russel Standish (putting another half-hitch in the threads being tangled here) and his use of "Syntactic" and "Semantic" in relationship to *Emergence* .

I understand there are already people who consider themselves "digital archaeologists", so this may not be so far fetched. As for who would pay for such things, it seems like the "digital paparazzi" are good candidates (as you imply with the Bill/Paula correspondences). In today's technology, I would expect someone to find captured Skype streams of virtual infidelities between people of such high profile! No end of the fun to be had out there... be careful and keep a low profile!

- Steve


Steve,

I think the Rainbow is still in my attic in Massachusetts!

So, when you are getting together your Museum of Computer Arcania, you can have it.

There's pretty much a decade of correspondence up there on disks that nobody can read, any more. Good thing none of my students ever became a president ... or was seduced by one. I lost another five years when I got mad at Outlook and switched to Earthlink's */Total Abcess/*. They announced one day that they weren't supporting it any more and ... that was that! Believe it or not, there was no way to bring those files over into another mail program. Even Dot Foil couldn't do it.

What will be the computer equivalent of the Box of Lincoln's letters uncovered in an old lady's attic in Peioria? Will an industry develop some time in the future of recovering old cp/m disks at vast expense? Bill's love emails to Paula Jones?

Nick

*From:*Friam [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Steve Smith
*Sent:* Tuesday, February 05, 2013 9:10 PM
*To:* The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
*Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] Arcane Points

Nick -

There have to be *some* APs in there for you... certainly your reference to the old Dec RAINBOW kicked a few neurons loose. Samna rings a bell, didn't they get bought up by Lotus? This kicks loose a cascade of neurons around the whole spreadsheet legacy of visicalc/123/improv!

Thanks, I'll be up all night dreaming pivot tables and projections of OLAP hypercubes!

- Steve

    How about A.P.'s for a word processor called Samna running on cpm
    on a computer called a Rainbow?  Had some features that Word has
    yet to introduce.

    N

    *From:*Friam [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of
    *Steve Smith
    *Sent:* Tuesday, February 05, 2013 1:40 PM
    *To:* The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
    *Subject:* [FRIAM] Arcane Points

    Robert -

        Can I get some Arcane Points for writing my first _program_ in
        ISO coded Atlas Autocode on an EELM KDF9?
        Robert C

I'm not sure what is required for granting Arcane Points... certainly, without help from Dr. Internet, I don't have a clue
    about these referencesI

    I suppose there is a "sweet spot" where *at least* one other
    member of the group recognizes the reference... but obviously not
    too many.  And I suppose that only makes them Obscure, not Arcane.

    Merriam Webster seems to distinguish Arcane from Obscure by
    invoking an element of the Mysterious or the Occult.   I think
    there is an overtone of being therefore only known to "the
    Initiate".   I suppose all of our references to Obscure (or
    Arcane) details is motivated by rememberances of our time as
    "Initiates", sort of offering a "secret handshake" from an old
    fraternity or childhood treehouse-club?

    Let's see who has an EELM KDF9 in their cupboard or a reference
    manual to Atlas Autocode in their bookshelf!

    - Steve




    ============================================================

    FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv

    Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College

    to unsubscribehttp://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com

Reply via email to