Sorry -

 

I thought I would get a chance to write an explanatory cover letter, but I
was wrong.  This presents itself as a Sports Blog, but it is so much more.
Scan down for entries on improbable collisions, including, for example, the
following. 

 

Apparrently an asteroid is passing between earth and our communication
satillites as we speak.  Duck!

Nick 

 

NASA Was Terrified by the Asteroids -- Terrified the Agency Might be
Assigned a Worthwhile Mission: During the offseason an asteroid crossed
within 48,000 miles of Earth
<http://www.planetary.org/news/2009/0302_Space_Rock_Swoops_by_Earth.html>
-- well inside the orbit of the moon, and only somewhat above the level of
telecommunications satellites. Another asteroid exploded in Earth's upper
atmosphere <http://www.scitech.ac.uk/PMC/PRel/STFC/asteroidwht.aspx> . In
July, something enormous struck Jupiter
<http://www.nasa.gov/topics/solarsystem/features/jup-20090720.html> ,
leaving a "scar" thousands of miles across in the dense Jovian atmosphere.
Had the object, probably a mega-comet, instead struck here, you would not be
reading this, as life on Earth would have ended last month. 

As telescopes and astronomy improve, potentially hazardous space objects --
asteroids and comets -- are turning out to be far more common than
previously believed and far more likely to hit the Earth than once assumed.
Currently there are more than 6,200 known near-Earth objects of significant
size <http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/stats> , and nearly two-thirds were discovered
in this decade. Details of the potentially deadly ones are here
<http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/risk> . As is shown here
<http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200806/asteroids> , astronomical discoveries
that there are a much greater number of dangerous space rocks than once
assumed, coupled to geological discoveries that wide-area destruction from
space-object strikes has been much more recent than we'd like to think,
argue for building a system to stop asteroids from hitting the Earth. But
while NASA continues to plan to waste hundreds of billions of your tax
dollars opening a Motel Six on the moon -- even Apollo 11 astronaut Buzz
Aldrin calls the moon base plan
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/15/AR200907150
2940.html> "a dead end" -- the space agency is doing nothing to protect the
Earth from space objects. 

Jupiter

NASA/JPL/Infrared Telescope FacilityThis impact mark on Jupiter is almost as
large as Earth. If whatever hit there hit here, you wouldn't be reading this
caption. But NASA still says all space money should be wasted!

Stopping an asteroid from hitting Earth appears technically feasible. Maybe
an anti-asteroid system would never be used, but if one were, this would not
only return tangible benefits to taxpayers -- it could be, oh, the single
greatest achievement in human history. Yet NASA hasn't lifted a finger on an
anti-space-object system. Space agency budget priorities continue to be
focused exclusively on serving NASA internal constituencies that benefit
from a Moon Motel Six -- aerospace contractors, congressional districts with
manned-space flight centers -- and the taxpayer be damned. Though, NASA just
established a Web site that lets you sign up for Twitter alerts on deadly
objects approaching Earth <http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/asteroidwatch> . Maybe
one will read, "Human life about to end. NASA got $1 trillion since founding
yet did nothing. LOL!"

 

 

Nicholas S. Thompson

Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Biology

Clark University

http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/

http://www.cusf.org <http://www.cusf.org/> 

 

 

<<image001.jpg>>

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com

Reply via email to