Since I asked the questions on this list, and now have the answers, I might as
well send them back to the list.
On Feb 26, 2013, at 9:24 AM, Barry MacKichan <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Embedding code in documentation was only half of Knuth's Web (Wow! This dates
> back to when the word 'web' had no other meaning in software). The part I
> don't see is the macro expansion that Knuth used. Is this implemented, or is
> the feeling that it is the wrong thing to use with modern languages?
No macro expansion. It was a long shot anyway.
> Also, does it apply markdown or multi markdown; the latter has support for
> math and footnotes, etc. I would guess it is configurable.
Duh. The markdown file *is* the source, so if you use markdown, you look at the
source with a markdown processor; if you want to use multi markdown, you look
at the source with a multi markdown processor.
> Do you know if the screenshot in http://cl.ly/LxEu is of Sublime Text 2? If
> so, is a special package required, or are they using the CoffeeScript package?
The screenshot is evidently of TextMate. Ashkenas fixed up his TextMate
CoffeeScript package which is trivially adapted to Sublime Text 2.
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
