On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:20 AM, glen e. p. ropella <[email protected]>wrote:
> Roger Critchlow wrote at 04/11/2013 03:42 PM: > > > One philosopher of science (Kuhn) says the study of human behavior is > > immature, when it's really good science it will settle on the correct > > method. > > > > Another philosopher of science (Longino) says maybe there isn't a single > > correct method, maybe there are multiple correct methods. > > So, have we converged on the idea that a philosopher of science is at > least analogous to an anthropologist, one who specializes in scientists? > > Except that an anthropologist has none of the philosopher's interest in deciding which of the subjects have the greatest or truest or any philo for sophia. -- rec --
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
