Owen sed:
I wonder how they deduce which areas are used for what purpose? They
stated several cases but w/o explanation, I think.
Taking this to FRIAM where introspective, tangential maunderings are
more tolerated.
I'm sure they knew a *huge* amount about ant colony structure and
function before doing this. While I'm sure they learned a few new
things, especially across a number of such "sculptures", I'm guessing
the commentary was simply confirming existing knowledge... probably not
easily deduced from what was being seen/shown alone.
My father did a similar expository project in HS biology by killing a
piglet, bleeding it out, then injecting colored latex (red into the
Aorta and Blue into the Vena Cavae) into it's circulatory system. Once
cured, he then boiled away the flesh and was left with the entertwined
vascular system in red and blue latex, right down (almost?) to the
capillary level. The first person who did such a thing *might* have
learned something new, and I'm sure *he* learned any number of new
things, but no real advancement was made... it probably got him an
extra-credit grade and encouraged him to continue... The story *still*
creeps me out.
I think what makes these kinds of "displays" powerful is their
expository ability over any analytic power. Much so-called Data
Viz/Info Viz is in the same realm... it's power is not in helping you
see something new that you didn't/couldn't already know, but in
presenting concisely something you already knew (or could have known).
As a novice to the data, it can feel as if the presentation is showing
you something new when more often than not, it is simply being concise
or sadly even hyperbolic, enhancing one interesting aspect (at the
expense of the others).
In my work with Visual Analytics (or Data Viz or Info Viz or ...), I am
often frustrated that people will get excited over the mundane while not
being willing to slow down or focus enough to notice the subtle and
sublime. Tufte, and even more to the point, Tukey have done a lot to
set a good standard but sadly, USA Today seems to be where people are
most familiar with the concept.
Russel Munroe of XKCD fame seems to have a very good perspective on how
to do it well <http://xkcd.com/980/> (and <http://xkcd.com/1127/> ...
and <http://xkcd.com/657/>... and <http://xkcd.com/1140/>) as well as
how to make fun of it <http://xkcd.com/1273/> ... and some more
<http://decisionstats.com/2012/02/08/top-5-xkcd-on-data-visualization/>.
On careful review, I realized all of his work is about making fun, but
*clearly* the guy has some real insight into the topics and methods at hand.
And if you are a real Viz-Geek you have to check out this tribute piece
to XKCD <http://www.r-bloggers.com/xkcd-visualized/>.
With the broad popularization of science as a spectator sport, I think
the actual work of science has been lost (obscured). I think this is
more the nature of pop culture than of science, however.
mumble,
- Steve
-- Owen
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Steve Smith <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Ever wonder what would happen if you poured molten aluminum
into an ant hole.
http://www.sciencedump.com/content/what-happens-when-you-pour-1200f-molten-aluminum-anthill
Cody Smith
"the cast will sacrifice the lives of the ants..."
The results *were* very cool.
--
Los Alamos Visualization Associates
LAVA-Synergy
4200 W. Jemez rd
Los Alamos, NM 87544
www.lava3d.com <http://www.lava3d.com>
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
505-920-0252 <tel:505-920-0252>
_______________________________________________
Wedtech mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/wedtech_redfish.com
_______________________________________________
Wedtech mailing list
[email protected]
http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/wedtech_redfish.com
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
