I haven't yet read Gelernter's piece, though a friend sent it earlier, and I 
glanced at it. I'm sorry he feels "bullied" by scientists, but science ain't 
beanbag.

I'd also point out that Marvin Minsky's last book argues that feelings are very 
much a part of intelligence. It's called "The Emotion Machine," and it's very 
persuasive.

P.



On Jan 9, 2014, at 4:27 PM, glen <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> Extremely well said!
> 
> Also, referring to the sentence just prior: "Computers are information
> machines. They transform one batch of information into another.
> Computationalists often describe the mind as an 'information processor.'
> But feelings are not information! Feelings are states of being."
> 
> Our previous conversation about the duality of state/process comes to
> mind.  Coming from a professor of computer science, you'd think
> Galernter would understand that a state of being is just as validly
> considered a process of being.  The information being processed while
> feeling (e.g. wistful) is the enteroceptive machine transforming one
> batch of information into another.
> 
> 
> On 01/09/2014 09:32 AM, Marcus G. Daniels wrote:
>> "But feelings are /not/ information! Feelings are states of being. A
>> feeling (mild wistfulness, say, on a warm summer morning) has,
>> ordinarily, no information content at all. /Wistful/ is simply a way to
>> /be/.''
>> 
>> If there was no such state of being estimated in a transpersonal way
>> then there would not be word for it.
>> 
>> American Heritage Dictionary:
>> 
>> wistful:
>>   1.  Full of wishful yearning
>>   2.  Pensively sad; melancholy
>> 
>> Does anyone seriously deny personality?   That there exists relatively
>> unique neural connectivity that makes Me different from anyone else?   
>> It hard makes me a `roboticist' to observe that the these unique
>> aspects, after subtracting off all that is known about personality, and
>> what I infer to be similar in other people (e.g. based on
>> stimulus/response experiments and modeling in everyday life), says to me
>> that I'm not excessively unique.  I'm again and again struck by how easy
>> it is to find examples of people (say, in the media) that seem eerily
>> like me and even seem to me `ahead' of me on acting on their feeling. 
>> If anything, this recognition of my humiliating smallness motivates me
>> to get up off my ass and find something about my life trajectory that
>> adds unique value.
>> 
>> One thing that gives meaning to human life is to have each add a little
>> bit to pool of written history and technology -- to make the subjective,
>> objective.
> 
> 
> -- 
> ⇒⇐ glen
> 
> ============================================================
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com

Reply via email to