On 1/17/14 11:34 AM, Marcus G. Daniels wrote:
On 1/17/14, 11:23 AM, glen wrote:
"But when the systemic property is reified, recognized, made explicit,
then we're more at risk. The middle class may just be the right mix of
heat and crystal to preserve agility."
Hypothesis is that it doesn't matter what the goal is. It could be
the Organic Unpaved Urban Park Imperative, or Blue Eyes and Blond
Hair, or whatever. While goals will be too complex or esoteric to
become the critical mass for nationalistic ferver, is it `ok' to have
the demes carrying on with ostensibly fascist psychology (reinforcing
themselves to condemn the `problem' and invent the final solution), or
should it be quashed at a local level too?
"should"? Sounds like fascism to me. <grin> going recursive up the
tailpipe methinks.
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
