Owen, 

 

There’s a marvelous article in the national geographic a few months back
about some Chasers who got chased.  Gives you an idea how very dangerous it
can be.   Tornadoes are rarely as wide as that one was, but still.   Worth a
stop at the library.  I should think the main danger would be all these
other guys hurtling around country roads talking on their cell phones and
looking at the sky.  I wonder how many storm chasers have been killed in
roadway accidents.   Penny and I got caught in a storm in Clayton a few
years back that was a outflow boundary rather than a tornado, although in
the early stages of an outflow boundary they can look the same.  I want to
tell you when you have one of those things coming at you down a road with no
sideturns, it’s pretty hard to think straight.  The Official instructions
for what to do if you can’t find shelter, is to get out of the car and jump
in the ditch. We pulled over as the thing came on and  I looked out the
window beside the car.  The ditch had two feet of water and hail slush.  No
way I was getting in there. 

 

I called my friend in the weather bureau and asked him what he would have
done.  He said, “I wouldn’t have been there.” 

 

So, now that I have had that advice, I will probably never drive into a
tornado watch area again.  

 

Nick 

 

 

 

Nick 

 

Nicholas S. Thompson

Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Biology

Clark University

 <http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/>
http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/

 

From: Friam [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Owen Densmore
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 9:33 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] tornado discussion

 

Like whale watching, there are folks who track down and watch tornados.
Have you ever tried it?  Probably pretty dangerous, but who knows, maybe
not.  It would be fascinating!

 

   -- Owen

 

On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 9:21 PM, Nick Thompson <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

Dear Friammers, 

 

It’s almost May, the season in which I provide posts on tornadoes and the
rest of you dopeslap me for my naïve interest in them.  A true sign of
spring, this message is. 

 

I offer for your amusement the following:

 

http://www.americanwx.com/bb/index.php/topic/43293-tornado-in-michoacan-mexi
co/

 

It contains two videos of an urban tornado in Mexico, the second of which
(marked NASA)  is by far the longest, steadiest portrait of a tornado I have
ever seen.  There are many mysterious aspects of this storm --- the high
base, the innocent sky, the absence of any lightning, or even any
precipitation in the region all seem strange.  I considered that it was a
hoax of some sort, but there is yet a third video of this same storm, taken
from another angle, and in this case, the video takers have to take shelter
from falling stuff.  Another feature of this storm that makes it exciting is
that it picks up long strands of agricultural debris (plastic row covers,
perhaps?) which have the effect of visualizing the circulation of the storm
outside the dustcolumn that we normally think of as “the tornado”.   One of
the thing that makes tornadoes seem so implausible is that the column itself
often seems quite strand-like and delicate. 

 

Please let me know what you think. 

 

N

 

Nicholas S. Thompson

Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Biology

Clark University

http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/

 


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com

 

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com

Reply via email to