http://www.sciencemag.org/content/344/6183/461.full
Male Scent May Compromise Biomedical Studies

   1. David 
Grimm<http://www.sciencemag.org/search?author1=David+Grimm&sortspec=date&submit=Submit>

Jeffrey Mogil's students suspected there was something fishy going on with
their experiments. They were injecting an irritant into the feet of mice to
test their pain response, but the rodents didn't seem to feel anything. "We
thought there was something wrong with the injection," says Mogil, a
neuroscientist at McGill University in Montreal, Canada.

The real culprit was far more surprising: The mice that didn't show pain
had been handled by *male* students. Mogil's group discovered that this
gender distinction alone was enough to throw off their whole experiment—and
likely influences the work of other researchers as well.

"This is very important work with wide-ranging implications," says M.
Catherine Bushnell, a neuroscientist and the scientific director of the
Division of Intramural Research at the National Center for Complementary
and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM) in Bethesda, Maryland. "Many people doing
research have never thought of this."

Mogil has studied pain for 25 years. He's long suspected that lab animals
respond differently to the sensation when researchers are present. In 2007,
his lab observed that mice spend less time licking a painful injection—a
sign that they're hurting—when a person is nearby, even if that "person" is
a cardboard cutout of Paris Hilton. Other scientists began to wonder if
their own data were biased by the same effect. "There were whisperings at
meetings that this was confounding research results," Mogil says.

So he decided to take a closer look. In the new study, Mogil told the
researchers in his lab to inject an inflammatory agent into the foot of a
rat or mouse and then take a seat nearby and read a book. A video camera
trained on the rodent's face assessed the animal's pain level, based on a
0- to 2-point "grimace scale" developed by the team. The results were
mixed. Sometimes the animals showed pain when an experimenter was present,
and sometimes they seemed just fine. So, on a hunch, Mogil and colleagues
recrunched the data, this time controlling for whether a male or a female
experimenter was present. "We were stunned by the results," he says. The
rodents showed significantly fewer signs of pain (an average of a 36% lower
score on the grimace scale) when a male researcher was in the room than
when a female researcher—or no researcher at all—was there.

Thinking back to his Paris Hilton experiment, Mogil wondered whether the
rodents were responding to the sight of a woman or man or to something more
subtle. So he told the people in his lab to place their worn T-shirts near
injected animals and then leave the room. Even when the humans weren't
present, the results were the same. Rats and mice showed about a 36% lower
score on the grimace scale when exposed to male versus female T-shirts, the
team reported online this week in *Nature Methods.* (Female mice were
slightly more sensitive to the effect.) Placing a woman's T-shirt next to a
man's T-shirt negated the impact. Bedding material from unfamiliar male
mice and guinea pigs, as well as pet beds slept in by unsterilized male
cats and dogs, produced the same response: Male odors seemed to act like
painkillers.

Further testing showed that the rodents exposed to male odors were actually
feeling less pain, rather than simply hiding the pain they were in. The
male aroma ramped up their stress levels, which deadened the hurt. "It's
really astounding that such a robust effect could have been missed for so
many years," Mogil says.

He suspects the rodents are reacting to scent chemicals that male mammals
have produced for eons. "It's a primordial response," he says. "If you
smell a solitary male nearby, chances are he's hunting or defending his
territory." If you're in pain, you're showing weakness.

Almost every animal behavior studied in the lab, from the effectiveness of
experimental drugs to the ability of monkeys to do math, is affected by
stress, notes Paul Flecknell, a veterinary anesthesiologist at Newcastle
University in the United Kingdom who researches ways to alleviate pain in
animals. "This could have an impact on just about everything."

Male odor could even influence human clinical trials. If a male doctor
injects you with a new kind of pain medication, do you feel better because
of the drug—or because of his gender? "It's not an unreasonable concern,"
Flecknell says.

The findings may also suggest why some labs have trouble reproducing the
results of other groups. "Sometimes pharmaceutical companies can't
replicate preclinical work," says Bushnell, who came to NCCAM to develop a
pain research program. "This could help explain that."

Still, Mogil doesn't think scientists need to redo decades of animal
research. "It's a confounding factor, but not a fatal one," he says. But
going forward, he advises, researchers should pay more attention not to
just what experiments they're doing, but also to who's doing the
experiments. "I joke that the solution is to fire all the male
researchers," Mogil says. "But at the very least, this is something teams
should be noting in the methods sections of their papers. We can change the
bath water without throwing out the baby."
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com

Reply via email to