On 02/23/2015 02:01 PM, Marcus G. Daniels wrote:
Glen writes:
``And anyone who "takes up arms" to achieve anything other than harm reduction,
is falling into the exact same ideological trap the believers are in. ''
Harm can only be defined.
Well, true. But that's partly the point of the harm reduction approach.
Regardless of how you define harm, reduction is the objective, not
elimination. We could convert it to benefit reduction and it would
still be a good practice ... it's simply a restatement of "everything in
moderation" ... or, perhaps even, "don't linearize the non-linear".
--
⇔ glen
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
