On 9/23/15 1:40 PM, Marcus Daniels wrote:
In practice, the tactic of creating doubt tends to be more about creating fear, and decreasing the resolve of the opponent, than it is about increasing the prevalence of skeptical thinking. I think flip-flopping is not that hard of a skill to master, it's whether one wants to devote the needed attention to segue between today's lie and tomorrow's in a sufficiently smooth way. At some level, any competence can be self-reinforcing and even enjoyable.
I would suggest that the act of lying for a compulsive liar *is* a flow state that keeps the endorphins kicking in...
Similarly for "professional" Skeptics or Cynics or Critics... the act of poking holes in "the other" is it's own reward independent of the actual semantics of the argument being poked or the poking itself.
I could say that Rhetoric in general can be it's own reward (possibly speaking from experience here!)
- Steve ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
