Hi, Marcus, 

 

Well, let’s isolate the things we agree about from the things we disagree 
about: 

 

Do you mean rich or capable?   

 

A disagreement may be lurking here, if you assume that wealth and capability 
are the same.   Or even if you assume that they are highly correlated.  Or even 
if you assume that the causal arrow is from capability to wealth.  But I am a 
typical liberal here, so any argument we might have would be boring to others.  

 

The mean incomes between countries could become more similar, but that doesn’t 
mean the variances within a country have to go down.  

 

ABSOLUTELY agreed.  In fact, that was my point.  Because the wealthy are 
economically more resilient, they are much more likely to capitalize on the 
disruption created by the equalization between national economies.  

 

 This could still lead to a situation where incomes are positively correlated 
to productivity.   

Yes, granting, of course, that the wealthy have the power mostly to determine 
what constitutes productivity.  

 

And the political destabilization could perhaps be better managed by also 
developing the control system in a globalized way.  

 

Not sure what you mean by this.  Can you say more?

 

Nick

 

 

Nicholas S. Thompson

Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Biology

Clark University

 <http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/> 
http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/

 

From: Friam [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Marcus Daniels
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2016 1:12 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] TPP pro and con

 

Do you mean rich or capable?    The mean incomes between countries could become 
more similar, but that doesn’t mean the variances within a country have to go 
down.    This could still lead to a situation where incomes are positively 
correlated to productivity.   And the political destabilization could perhaps 
be better managed by also developing the control system in a globalized way.  

 

From: Friam [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Nick Thompson
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2016 11:03 AM
To: 'The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group' <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> >
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] TPP pro and con

 

Yeah, Owen, but …. .  The problem is that when you go to equalize incomes 
between nations, the rich people in the poorer countries that are being 
equalized grab all the income and the poorer people in the rich countries take 
most of the hit, and income disparity within all countries goes up, leading to 
political destabilization.  

 

N

 

Nicholas S. Thompson

Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Biology

Clark University

 <http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/> 
http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/

 

From: Friam [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Owen Densmore
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2016 12:47 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> >
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] TPP pro and con

 

Agreed. All the pundits liken it to immigration. Buying Chinese goods is 
equivalent to letting them immigrate, but only in an economic sense. The result 
is to create a world economy where each citizen is given equal rights and 
privileges. And median income.

 

On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Marcus Daniels <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

"Among the big losers - those who gained little or nothing - were those at the 
bottom and the middle and working classes in the advanced countries."

Is that not only expected, but even intended?   Globalization gives people 
opportunities that don't have them and takes them away from an overly 
expensive, underskilled workforce?

-----Original Message-----
From: Friam [mailto:[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> ] On Behalf Of Joe Spinden
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2016 10:15 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> >
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] TPP pro and con

For an informed commentary:

https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/globalization-new-discontents-by-joseph-e--stiglitz-2016-08?utm_source=project-syndicate.org
 
<https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/globalization-new-discontents-by-joseph-e--stiglitz-2016-08?utm_source=project-syndicate.org&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=authnote>
 &utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=authnote


--
Joe


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com

 

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com

Reply via email to