On 09/14/2016 01:50 PM, Marcus Daniels wrote:
I suppose if work/life lasts long enough, folks will identify ways to avoid the 
attractors.
A tabu search needs a global data structure to be most efficient.   In other 
words, workers need some literacy.

Yes, except there are no optima other than uniqueness.  Even _if_ a bunch is on 
an attractor, as long as your path around it is distinct from another's path 
around it, you're good.  But you're right that the individuals need some 
literacy.  You have to be able to locally compare your path to your neighbors 
and tell whether or not your path is unique in any sense.  I'll admit that's 
more difficult than it seems, depending on one's ability to navigate the 
concrete ←→ abstract spectrum.  The more abstract one's thinking, the more 
difficult it will be to find a unique path.  Concreteness is bliss.

--
☣ glen

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com

Reply via email to