It's interesting to think about verification, validation, and optimization.  
But most of that is premature if the _model_ is the cause of the behavior we 
want to avoid.  E.g.

  Has democracy become a threat to the planet?
  
http://www.irishtimes.com/culture/has-democracy-become-a-threat-to-the-planet-1.2853289

Sure, if the electoral vote boils down to a popular vote count in one or more 
states, then things like voter access/fraud/suppression and tampering become 
important.  But if, even assuming zero popular vote error, voting leads to an 
unintentionally self-destructive outcome, then the model should be fixed 
regardless of the model's implementation.

The "mazel tov cocktail" 
(http://crooksandliars.com/2016/11/trump-surrogate-calls-molotov-cocktail) aspect of voting 
for Trump is quite clear, to me.  If it were clear to everyone that a vote for Trump is a 
vote for annihilation, and the majority of people vote to kill themselves, then I'm all for 
it.  But Trump supporters don't express that.  They express the idea that Trump would improve 
things (and not blow us all to hell).  That means that Trump voters don't _intend_ the bad 
outcome that most rational people expect, were he elected.  This means there's a flaw in the 
model, regardless of any VV&A problems.


On 11/07/2016 11:42 AM, Marcus Daniels wrote:
I'm more worried about data loss (data corruption of memory sticks, software 
bugs in scanning votes), or voter suppression.


http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2016/11/we_looked_at_130_million_ballots_from_the_2012_election_and_found_zero_fraud.html

<http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2016/11/we_looked_at_130_million_ballots_from_the_2012_election_and_found_zero_fraud.html>
        
We Looked at 130 Million Ballots From the 2012 Election and Found Practically Zero 
Potential Fraud 
<http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2016/11/we_looked_at_130_million_ballots_from_the_2012_election_and_found_zero_fraud.html>
www.slate.com
In the months leading up to Tuesday’s vote, Donald Trump has repeatedly 
asserted that there will be rampant voter fraud on Election Day, stoking fears 
...


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Friam <[email protected]> on behalf of cody dooderson 
<[email protected]>
*Sent:* Monday, November 7, 2016 11:29:00 AM
*To:* The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
*Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] Trump Is Just A Normal Polling Error Behind Clinton | 
FiveThirtyEight

It might not be too late to start the free edX course on voting fraud. 
https://www.edx.org/course/us-voting-access-fraud-davidsonx-davnowxvoting .

--
☣ glen
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

Reply via email to