I'm sure it works. I used to "prove" quite a lot of theorems with some simple 2D diagrams that required pages of dense formulae to prove symbolically. But interestingly, I found that mathematicians not brought up on visual mathematical thinking could not grasp what I was talking about, so ended up having to translate the proofs into symbols anyway.
Incidently, I tend to code the same way :). I imagine this technqiue will only be accepted if it provides results not achievable symbolically. Which may well be the case. Feynmann's doodles would be another example of this. Cheers On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 08:40:12PM -0700, Owen Densmore wrote: > Interesting new research making Math More Lego-like: 3-D picture-language > has far-reaching potential, including in physics > > http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2017/03/making-math-more-lego-like/ > > Anyone familiar with this? Does it work? :) > > -- Owen > ============================================================ > FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv > Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College > to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com > FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dr Russell Standish Phone 0425 253119 (mobile) Principal, High Performance Coders Visiting Senior Research Fellow [email protected] Economics, Kingston University http://www.hpcoders.com.au ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
