I think Sugar is the new Tobacco on many fronts... it WILL fall (somewhat), albeit slowly. And we will be able to get it without the tax on the Reservation from a drive-through window?

Meanwhile I need to start a fresh batch of Kombucha and if the *only* reliable source of sugar is (as recommended) pure, refined, white sugar, then I'll pay the tax (or ask my RMJ seeking friends to pick some bootleg white cane sugar up at a dispensary on the Colorado border).

Or maybe I need to understand better why I can't get good results from less refined sugars or (OMG!) Honey. Or move on back to probiotics based on things I can grow myself (saurkraut, kimchee, kefir, etc.)?

I don't like (Gub'Mint) regulation on principle but it might actually be a reductio-ad-absurdum argument against any/all of our myriad "well laid plans" brought to us by industry and commerce?

A favorite duality:  "A conspiracy theory, or just a good business plan?"

Neo-Retro-Techno-Luddite,

 - Steve


On 4/26/17 12:31 PM, Tom Johnson wrote:
I'm wondering this morning, if the nation seems to have accepted the fact that the federal government can regulate vehicle mileage, //require seat belt installation, testing of drugs for public consumption, etc., how come it can't regulate sugar (and sodium?) in food and drink? Could it be the sugar lobby is stronger than car manufactures and Big Pharma?

TJ


============================================
Tom Johnson
Institute for Analytic Journalism --     Santa Fe, NM USA
505.577.6482(c)           505.473.9646(h)
Society of Professional Journalists <http://www.spj.org>
*Check out It's The People's Data <https://www.facebook.com/pages/Its-The-Peoples-Data/1599854626919671>* http://www.jtjohnson.com <http://www.jtjohnson.com/> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
============================================

On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 12:02 PM, George Duncan <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Much as I agree with Tom's analysis and wish for a better process
    for public policy decision making (hey that was my career at
    Carnegie Mellon!), the issue here for our own voting is whether we
    better off if this initiative passes. I vote yes. Indeed I have
    already voted yes.

    Also I cannot believe that a win for no will convince people
    towards quality decision making...but rather that major corporate
    money must win in the public arena.

    On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 11:42 AM glen ☣ <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:


We have a lot of data on whether sin taxes do or don't work. And that data is colored/interpreted by everyone who sees it,
        like all data.

        And that brings me to my problem with Tom's argument.  We can
        focus on this part:

          "Voting on the measure is also a vote for or against good
        social science research, good public policy and
        administration, and full transparency of the people’s data."

        We've been over and over in several threads (that I'm sure
        seemed hijacked by the more linear amongst us) about
        _induction_ and the validity or soundness of the predicates it
        leads to.  Way back when I worked at a healthcare informatics
        company, "evidence-based" was all the rage.  Then a (small)
        group of debunkers finally realized and advocated a move from
        the concept of "evidence-based" to "science-based"
        (https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/about-science-based-medicine/
        <https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/about-science-based-medicine/>).
        Add to that that many of my colleagues in the social sciences
        tout evidence-based or science-based policy.

        I have some very deep reservations against such, with the same
        _flavor_ as my objection to the idea that government
        should/can be run like a business.  (Part of the rhetoric in
        favor of Trump.)  Government is not, inherently, a scientific
        enterprise.  It's an _engineering_ enterprise.  And engineers
        don't really care about reality as it is.  They care about
        reality as they intend it to be.  Sure, good engineers take
        the intitial conditions into account.  But whether the initial
conditions have us on earth or mars doesn't matter that much. What matters is that we want to _go_ to Proxima Centauri.

        So, while I agree with the letter of the sentence above, I may
        disagree with the implication.

        FWIW, were I still in Santa Fe, I'd vote "yes".

        On 04/26/2017 09:57 AM, Gillian Densmore wrote:
        > I agree anecdotally residents of NM need help with education
        and health.
        > I am skeptical a tax on basically fake food,s and treats is
        a helpful way
        > to do that though.
        > Postive programs and tools  might help more than yet another
        tax possibly
        > can.


        --
        ☣ glen

        ============================================================
        FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
        Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
        to unsubscribe
        http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
        <http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com>
        FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
        <http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/> by Dr. Strangelove

-- George Duncan
    Emeritus Professor of Statistics, Carnegie Mellon University
    georgeduncanart.com <http://georgeduncanart.com/>
    See posts on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram
    Land: (505) 983-6895 <tel:%28505%29%20983-6895>
    Mobile: (505) 469-4671 <tel:%28505%29%20469-4671>

    My art theme: Dynamic exposition of the tension between matrix
    order and luminous chaos.


      "Attempt what is not certain. Certainty may or may not come
      later. It may then be a valuable delusion."

    From "Notes to myself on beginning a painting" by Richard Diebenkorn.

    "It's that knife-edge of uncertainty where we come alive to our
    truest power." Joanna Macy.



    ============================================================
    FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
    Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
    to unsubscribe
    http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
    <http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com>
    FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
    <http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/> by Dr. Strangelove




============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

Reply via email to