Ha! I would never say such a thing, because I agree with von Neumann: https://pionic.org/understanding-vs-knowing
"In mathematics you don’t understand things. You simply get used to them." Note, however, that I vehemently disagree with the gist of that article, though. On 05/31/2017 03:57 PM, Gillian Densmore wrote: > <def humourXMS==funny> > <Humor> > Then I'm supposed to say something like but but what if we could make a > Tardis and proclaim All hail Galifrey!, and this is about where I feel like > shouting: Computer End program, herbal tea, warm!. > (doing my best/worst picard impersonation) > > Glen then says something like: ok smart alec. Let me explain Arrows > Conjector so as you can understand! and besides it's early grey, hot! :P > ^_^ :P > I then say: Huh well my poor little dyslexic brain thought thought Arrows > Conjecture shows why with any given group of people they are unlikely to > agree on everything, somethings but not everything.. > Some else says: Your doing type thinking again and sounding a bit smarmy! > that's close-sort of, with all mathy conjectures theirs about 5 butts to > know about. as well!.. > </Humor> > (This is my bad attempt at being funny) -- ☣ glen ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
