Well, Dave promised to give us a gist of Wagner.  And Grant has chimed in 
regarding the stochasticity of crossover, which provoked an inadequate response 
from Nick, if I remember correctly.  Since you're actively reading Wagner now, 
Nick, perhaps you could give us a summary of what he might have meant by 
Jenny's quote?  Repeated here for convenience:

On 8/9/17 8:56 AM, Jenny Quillien wrote:
>
> An excellent foray into such a topic is Arrival of the Fittest: how nature 
> innovates by Andreas Wagner.
>
> From the Preface:  the power of natural selection is beyond dispute, but this 
> power has limits. Natural selection can preserve innovations, but it cannot 
> create them. And calling the change that creates them random is just another 
> way of admitting our ignorance about it. Nature's any innovations- some 
> uncannily perfect - call for natural principles that accelerate life's 
> ability to innovate, its innovability.
>




On 08/22/2017 08:10 AM, Nick Thompson wrote:
> I have been trying to get somebody to tussle with me over this claim since it 
> was first made. 
> I think it’s nonsense, but I am not sure.
>
> *From:*Friam [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Eric Charles
> *Sent:* Monday, August 21, 2017 8:11 PM
> *To:* The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[email protected]>
> *Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] random v stochastic v indeterminate
> 
>  
> 
> Sorry to pull at a still thread, but I find this claim fascinating.
> "Natural selection can /preserve/ innovations, but it cannot create them."
> 
> Would we say the same of artificial selection? I'm pretty sure we would 
> normally claim that artificial selection has lead to all sorts of 
> innovations. Maybe I'm thinking of "innovations" more broadly than is 
> intended?!? Aren't the baring and tail-wagging, multi-colored, short-snouted, 
> cuddly foxes an example of innovation? (For those who don't know, it takes a 
> pretty short number of generations to turn wild foxes into reasonable 
> approximations of domestic dogs, and all you have to do is select against 
> aggression towards humans.)
> 
> I know what the quote is trying to get at, but I'm not sure it holds up in 
> the wider context of things-that-cause biological innovation.

-- 
gⅼеɳ

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

Reply via email to