Are there computational (or otherwise not shown) costs to the members that 
continue in the free case but are pruned in the selection case?

On 1/2/19 7:44 AM, Marcus Daniels wrote:
> Here are a couple of plots from a large constrained optimization problem I've 
> been running.   
> In the first case, I apply selection pressure:  If a solution is not in the 
> top 200 performers, it dies.
> In the second case, the population can continue to grow without concern for 
> its performance.   
> This is a 5900-dimensional pseudo-boolean problem and the best-known solution 
> is around 2.61e+08.   Note the low end of the y axis is not close to this.   
> In both cases, aggressive efforts are made to diversify the population and in 
> both cases every shown solution is unique (even though their energies can 
> collide). 
> 
> In this case, I would argue that selection pressure has accomplished nothing 
> -- conservatism doesn't work if the goal is to create the most fit 
> individuals.  The mean moves, if you care about that.   But the very best 
> solutions are nearly the same, and neither have come close to the optimal.   


-- 
∄ uǝʃƃ

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

Reply via email to