Glen writes:

<   So, one of our cats died on Wednesday.  She went in for exploratory surgery 
to investigate a mass that was preventing food from moving from her stomach to 
her intestines.  It was a pyloric adenoma the surgeon saw no good way to fix.  
So we killed her.  The important question is: To what extent did we destroy any 
happiness, good will, comfort, etc. by putting her through a 2 week process of 
changing her diet, forcing barium down her throat, poking her for blood draws, 
etc?  She was a super happy cat for ~5 years.  But her life ended in terror and 
pain (despite the relatively humane way we did things compared to what it could 
have been).  >

I have a different view of going to extreme means to help a pet than I once 
did.   It is easy to look back in hindsight with diagnostic knowledge that was 
hard to come by and say it could/should have gone another way.   It's harder 
for a young animal that might get back to normal and be happy again.   I had a 
13 year old dog once that did recover for about six months but then sure enough 
the cancer came back even worse, along with other degenerative processes that 
made her life hard.   I should have thought more about the average lifetime for 
that breed and the severity of her condition and let her go earlier, but the 
diagnosis had come as a surprise.  

I don't know about cats, but dogs I think recognize what is happening.   This 
discussion of humans is also interesting.

https://www.theatlantic.com/family/archive/2019/01/how-do-people-communicate-before-death/580303/












============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

Reply via email to