So, I stumbled on this today: The Alt-Right Playbook: The Card Says Moops https://youtu.be/xMabpBvtXr4
Transcript here: http://innuendostudios.tumblr.com/post/182302598987/new-video-essay-internet-reactionaries-argue-as And my ignorance forced me to find out which "Stanislavski" they were referring to at 8:37, where they define the "Stanislavski Opinion" - "the opinion you entertain so completely that you functionally believe it, while you express it, no matter the possibility that you will express - and, to an extent, believe - an opposite opinion later." I *guess* it's this guy: https://www.theguardian.com/stage/2012/apr/17/modern-drama-konstantin-stanislavsky Once again, FriAM has helped me reduce the cone of uncertainty in my own opinion about, say, why I think Tom Cruise is such a bad actor compared to someone like, say, Chloë Sevigny. I just don't intuit that Cruise plays the role, so much as "talks" on topic. I once (like, 20 years ago) got into a rather heated argument with a mentor about the difference between a simulation and an emulation. He was *trying*, I think, to make this same point to that younger version of myself. On 1/15/19 10:26 AM, Marcus Daniels wrote: > Why do there have to be roles and not just topics? -- ∄ uǝʃƃ ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
