Steve, 

 

All I can say is, for a man in excruciating pain, you sure write good.  Your 
response was just what I needed.  

 

Now, when I think of a manifold, my leetle former-english-major brain thinks 
shroud, and the major thing about a shroud is that it covers something.  Now I 
suspect that this is an example of irrelevant surplus meaning to a 
mathematician, right?  A mathematician doesn’t give a fig for the corpse, only 
for the properties of the shroud.  But is there a mathematics of the relation 
between the shroud and the corpse?  And what is THAT called.  

 

So, imagine the coast of Maine with all its bays, rivers and fjords.  Imagine 
now a map of infinite resolution of that coastline, etched in ink.  I assume 
that this is a manifold of sorts.   Now gradually back off the resolution of 
the map until you get the kind of coastline map you would get if you stopped at 
the Maine Turnpike booth on your way into the state and picked a tourist 
brochure.  Now that also is a manifold of sorts, right?  In my example, both 
are representations of the coastline, but I take it that in the mathematical 
conception the potential representational function of a “manifold” is not of 
interest? 

 

Nick 

 

Nicholas S. Thompson

Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Biology

Clark University

 <http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/> 
http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/

 

From: Friam [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Steven A Smith
Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2019 2:42 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Manifold Enthusiasts

 

Carl -

This may be a bit more than Nick is prepared for, but it IS an 
interesting/useful paper and table...  and perhaps somewhat relevant to the 
discussion around embodiment and mathematics and whether understanding through 
analogy/metaphor grounds out in sensorial experience or in something more 
platonic like Frank's "Right Triangles" and such.

Nick -

Like all good answers, mine to your shroud/manifold starts with "it depends".   
You are capturing *part* of the essence of a Manifold with your "shroud" and 
yet another with your "shrink wrap".   

If the "corpse is complete with skin/tissues/etc. and we don't imagine stuffing 
the shroud or shrink-wrap material through the gastrointestinal track, then the 
shroud you drape over it provides a continuous surface, but of course it is not 
closed.   When you come to the edge (hemmed or not) you would need to flip over 
and walk "the other side" or *fall off*.   Your "shrink wrap" goes one further 
and *closes* the shroud.  which then makes it a simple manifold topologically 
equivalent to a sphere (as the decomposing body emits gas, the shrink wrap may 
inflate to a roughly spherical shape).    

There are a number of examples of how your shrink-wrap manifold might have a 
more complex topology.  The aforementioned GI tract represents a hole-through 
which if shrink-wrapped fully/properly/vigorously (perish the image!) yields a 
torus (donut).  IF your corpse was "shot or stabbed through with holes" (or 
decomposed to the point of only consisting of bones and minimal connective 
tissue) it becomes "yet more complex" with "yet more holes".  I can't think of 
a physically possible way said body could become a more complex topology 
through in principle, one might graft arms and legs (or other appendages) to 
one another in such a manner as to make a trefoil or more complex knot, but 
that verges on "just silly".  If you read Science Fiction, even someone as 
respectable as Kurt Vonnegut (often treated more as mainstream literature in 
spite of his very fanciful assumptions) then you might have encountered an 
alternative example of such a shrink-wrap-cum-knot that is topologically 
equivalent to a klein bottle (or yet more interesting/complex) but the 
narrative leading there would probably seem gratuitously silly.

As for manifolds as used for internal combustion engines, I won't try to 
reproduce my painful description/speculation about the relation between those 
and *mathematical manifolds*.  Let it suffice to say that the purpose of an 
intake or exhaust manifold  is to route a volume of fuel-air mixture from the 
carbuerator (possibly more than one in some engines) to the intake ports of 
each of several cylinders in a smooth and continuous fashion.   These are NOT 
closed surfaces since they are open on the carburator end as well as each of 
the intake port ends, but their geometric complexity is reminiscent/suggestive 
of mathematical manifolds.   The exhaust manifold(s) on an internal combustion 
engine do just the opposite, collecting hot exhaust gasses from several 
cylinders and combining them into a single output to run through things like 
catalytic converters and mufflers before releasing into the atmosphere to choke 
pedestrians, the city, and the globe (can you tell I've become an EV snob?).

 - Ettiene SHRDLU

Nick, 

 

This may help with manifold analogies.   Or should I phrase that 
differently.... 

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/rosetta.pdf . See esp table 1, though most of the 
paper is probably more than you want.

 

Carl

 

 

On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 10:20 AM Nick Thompson <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

Ok, so:  consider a corpse.  Is the skin of a corpse a manifold?  Now. Drop
a shroud over that corpse, is the shroud a manifold?  Now, shrink wrap the
corpse and carefully seal the edges.  Is it now a closed manifold?  

No, huh?  Well, ok.  

Nick 

Nicholas S. Thompson
Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Biology
Clark University
http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/


-----Original Message-----
From: Friam [mailto:[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> ] On Behalf Of
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2019 5:10 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> >
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] excess meaning alert? (was, Re: are we how we behave?)

Nick et al., "surplus meaning" was the term I was misremembering.

Further replies to Nick's further questions later.


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe
http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove





============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

Reply via email to