I'm not following. What has LaTex vs Mathematica got to do with the proofs in question?
----------------------------------- Frank Wimberly My memoir: https://www.amazon.com/author/frankwimberly My scientific publications: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Frank_Wimberly2 Phone (505) 670-9918 On Sat, Apr 27, 2019, 6:52 PM Marcus Daniels <[email protected]> wrote: > Russell writes: > > < However, conversely, there appear to interesting results that indicate > P=NP for random oracle machines. There is some controversy over this, > though, and personally, I've never been able to follow the proofs in the > area :). > > > Minimally, why is LaTeX the preferred format and not, say, Mathematica? > At least the latter makes it complete and computable. > > Marcus > ============================================================ > FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv > Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College > to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com > archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ > FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove >
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
