One thing the responses to your post haven't mentioned is that you flatten (or 
"thin" or "reduce") relativism to its most simple form. I find people tend to 
do this with pluralism, as well. And I think Marcus does a nice job of showing 
that nihilism isn't as thin as we may think, either.

Since I care most about pluralism, I'll make my argument there. A pluralist 
isn't required to believe in an infinity of things, only more than 1 thing. 
E.g., to my mind, those who believe the standard model's particle zoo is a 
problem may *still* be pluralists. But there's just too many fundamental 
objects. So, let's unify them down to, say, 3 things. But we don't necessarily 
have to unify them down to 1 thing. 

Of course, pluralists need not be discretists, either. So, there's nothing 
special about 1 vs 2. What fractal dimension *should* have taught us is that 
there are probably competent ways to model reality that allow for, say, 1.001 
fundamental types of thing ... or 13.7 or whatever. Oversimplification is a 
risk for any -ism unifier. And it seems like you've done that for relativism.

On 11/15/19 3:47 AM, Eric Charles wrote:
> The relativist asserts that competence-incompetence and stupid-smart have no 
> tangible meaning.  
> 
> Who is competent and who isn't? Eh, it depends on your point of view, and no 
> point of view is better than another. The designation of "competence" is a 
> colonialist activity providing illusory justification for the marginalization 
> already oppressed groups, and while it has a valence, it has no basis in 
> "reality" (i.e., it is bad, you should stop doing it, and you should deeply 
> hate yourself for ever having had done it). To label the president as 
> incompetent is to inappropriately invalidate his way of being in the world; 
> ways of being are all equally valid. 
> 
> Who is stupid and who isn't? Eh, it depends on your point of view, and no 
> point of view is better than another.....
> 
> If you believe that SOME people ARE competent and/or smart, then you can't be 
> a relativist. If you believe there is still some chance that competent and 
> smart people can make a difference, you are not a nihilist. 
> 
> Old Soviet Joke: A man walks into a shop and asks, "You wouldn't happen to 
> have any fish, would you?". The shop assistant replies, "You've got it wrong 
> – ours is a butcher's shop. We don't have any meat. You're looking for the 
> fish shop across the road. There they don't have any fish!"

-- 
☣ uǝlƃ

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

Reply via email to