So, here's a question that's been percolating as I've listened to Philip Goff talk about his form of panpsychism <https://thepanpsycast.com/panpsycast>. Is it consistent [†] for a person to be:
1) A behaviorist, 2) A methodological pluralist, and 3) A monist. It seems to me that (1) and (2) prevent (3). [†] Note that it's fine to be inconsistent. As an admitted pluralist, I'd be inconsistent to disallow inconsistency. 8^) Or, maybe it's better to say, in order to be consistent, I must allow inconsistency. On 11/17/19 11:27 AM, Nick Thompson wrote: > Well, I should have conceded this point long ago: of course I am a > è/methodological //ç /pluralist. There are many ways to skin a cat. -- ☣ uǝlƃ ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
