But he impulsively blabs his motives in front of the camera every day?

From: Friam <[email protected]> on behalf of "[email protected]" 
<[email protected]>
Reply-To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[email protected]>
Date: Thursday, January 30, 2020 at 11:37 AM
To: 'The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group' <[email protected]>
Subject: [FRIAM] Trumps motives not judiciable because they are "in his head"

Hi everybody,

I am often been hard pressed by members of the “home church” to supply examples 
of how locating motives “in the head” is not only a misdirection but actually a 
dangerous illusion.  I give you 
https://shows.acast.com/the-report/episodes/the-impeachment-day-7 which, at 
minute 7:40, contains an argument that Trump’s motives cannot be inferred from 
his behavior because motives are inherently subjective, “in the head” of the 
motivated person.   This, of course, contradicts long standing legal practice, 
where demonstrating motive from higher-order patterns in behavior (i.e., 
patterns distributed more broadly in time and space than in the moments 
surrounding the motivated act) is a necessary element in most criminal cases.  
It is, for instance, the main element that distinguishes manslaughter from 
murder.   In fact, the whole range of offences resulting in death are 
distinguished by the degree to which the jury thinks the lethal act was 
“voluntary”.

By the way, that link will serve to introduce you to the lawfare 
“reports<https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-report/id1472798169>” which 
attempt to provide a neutral precis of the proceedings, day by day.

Nick

PS:  I just did a dive into the legal dictionary.  Interesting.  Apparently, 
the law makes a big distinction between 
motive<https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/motivation> and 
intent<https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/motivation>, the former 
being more like having a reason to commit a crime, the latter being more like 
setting about to commit the crime.  Interesting stuff, this law business  No 
wonder Oliver Wendell Holmes was a pragmatist.!

N
Nicholas Thompson
Emeritus Professor of Ethology and Psychology
Clark University
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/







============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

Reply via email to