On first skim, I agreed with you. But now I think I disagree. My point was that 
the rise of the Celebrity-Queen (e.g. Trump), where power is further focused 
into the hands of whichever cheeper-by-the-dozen human that occupies that seat, 
willing or not, we're further consolidating *all* organizations' powers into 
the hands of that one human. So, it *used* to be the case that the Queen was a 
mere vessel (vassal?), whether to the occult mechanism (capitalism) or to the 
corporation. But now, that era is coming to an end. It's more true now that 
Turkey *is* Erdoğan, the US *is* Trump, Oracle is Ellison, etc.


On 2/20/20 8:36 AM, Marcus Daniels wrote:
> Looking at it from the perspective of the gig economy, where employees are 
> human resources to be expended, employees should absorb as much of the 
> resources as possible from employers like these and then move on.   The Queen 
> is simply a vessel for capital and maximizing the rate at which it drains is 
> an ethic professionals can collectively adopt.  In this way, those 
> organizations that don't act this way will have a dramatic competitive 
> advantage.


-- 
☣ uǝlƃ

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

Reply via email to