Sorry, Glen. I didn't mean to imply any kind of argument in the matter. The comment just interested me, and I thought you might have information to share with me. It wasn't clear that I could even support the more general proposition, the one I thought you were making, let alone the more specific one that you actually made.
Nick Nicholas Thompson Emeritus Professor of Ethology and Psychology Clark University [email protected] https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/ -----Original Message----- From: Friam <[email protected]> On Behalf Of u?l? ? Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2020 10:58 AM To: FriAM <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [FRIAM] science privilege — fork from acid epistemology I'm not going to answer because that's irrelevant. The challenge is whether or not conversations like this impact the science done by those who have them. On 3/12/20 9:56 AM, [email protected] wrote: > Ah! When you say that the benefit of philosophy to science is > "straightforward", what do you have in mind? -- ☣ uǝlƃ ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
