Sorry. I didn't imply that _reopening_ businesses for a couple of days/week
would reduce infections. I was talking in the context of Jim's comments about
underdampening. I feel like reopening businesses for 2 fixed days per week (and
only those 2 days, same days for every business) would *drive* infections in a
way that we could then distinguish from the noise.
I haven't seen any more data since they first started saying median 5.1 days
from infection to symptoms. But 7-2 = 5. 8^) It might produce a cleaner signal
to do it every 2 weeks. But that might be too difficult for us plebes. Our
recycling and garbage services are on alternating 2 week schedules. So, here,
we could simply add the alerts to our app ("RecycleCoach", I think it's
called). But back in Portland, both garbage and recycling came every week.
On 4/8/20 6:11 PM, Steven A Smith wrote:
> I'm not sure why you imply reducing the number of days would reduce
> infections?
--
☣ uǝlƃ
.-. .- -. -.. --- -- -..-. -.. --- - ... -..-. .- -. -.. -..-. -.. .- ... ....
. ...
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam
unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
