More on 2 types:

Vulnerable and Grandiose Narcissism Are Differentially Associated With Ability 
and Trait Emotional Intelligence
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01606/full

Vulnerable Vs Grandiose Narcissism: Which Is More Harmful?
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-mysteries-love/201906/vulnerable-vs-grandiose-narcissism-which-is-more-harmful

The first article is more credible, I suppose. It seems to my incompetent eye 
to describe 2 different *subclinical* types. But the second article is more 
provocative to me because it talks about an *oscillation* in clinical (as 
opposed to subclinical) NPD, which kindasorta echoes what I tried to say about 
modes and rates.

But what's most interesting, I guess, is that Dunning-Kruger might be at play. 
Where a narcissist might be incompetent, she might over-estimate her skills (at 
emotional intelligence as well as whatever else) [†]. The distinction between 
"trait EI" and "ability EI" is lost on me, however. So I can't quite parse the 
ending statements of the first paper. I can definitely parse the part about it 
being an online survey. 8^)


[†] We might infer that Trump's narcissism is NOT the problem. It's his sheer 
incompetence that's the problem. So all this yapping about him being a 
narcissist might be, at best, wasted breath and, at worst, a red herring 
distracting from the real problem.

On 4/27/20 12:03 PM, uǝlƃ ☣ wrote:
> Sorry for any overemphasis. I was merely *wondering if* there might be 2 
> types. I was inferring it partly from the Alternate model in the DSM 5 and 
> partly from my own sense that the way people talk about them is 
> contradictory. Your quote from Kernberg only hints at it.
> 
> Being episodic, myself, I could see how there would not be two *types*, but 
> perhaps two *modes*. 1) defining one's self-esteem based on others' adulation 
> (external locus) and 2) defining one's self-esteem based on some internal 
> urgic homunculus (internal locus). If it's modal, then the same person might 
> display (1) and (2) depending on the time, space, or context, leading to an 
> apparent contradiction in the arching narrative/ephemeris, but resolving it 
> by slicing up into episodes. And if it's a *speed* or rate thing (like 
> fast/slow thinking), then it's plausible that (1) iterates rapidly while (2) 
> iterates slowly.
> 
> I'll take a look at the Kernberg book. Thanks!
> 
> On 4/27/20 11:53 AM, Frank Wimberly wrote:
>> Does this quote from Kernberg have to do with your feeling that there are 
>> two types of narcissist:
>>
>>
>> In general their relationships with other people are clearly exploitive and 
>> sometimes parasitic. It is as if they feel they have the right to control 
>> and possess others and to exploit them without guilt feelings--and behind a 
>> surface which very often is charming and engaging, one senses coldness and 
>> ruthlessness.
>> Very often such patients are considered to be dependent because they need so 
>> much tribute and adoration from others but on a deeper level they are 
>> completely unable really to depend on anybody because of their deep distrust 
>> and depreciation of others.
>>
>> ---
>> Frank C. Wimberly
>> 140 Calle Ojo Feliz,
>> Santa Fe, NM 87505
>> 505 670-9918
>> Santa Fe, NM
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2020, 12:42 PM Frank Wimberly <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>     I think I said that person's with NPD are almost psychotic.  I checked 
>> with my wife, a very experienced clinician, and she says that is not 
>> correct.  But she also says that there are not two types.  One interesting 
>> thing that she said is that her mentor, a training analyst, said that after 
>> treating a narcissist for many years you can uncover a severe obsessional 
>> personality at which point you have to start again to treat that.  That 
>> implies a treatment length that only someone like Woody Allen can afford.  
>> I'm not saying that he's a malignant narcissist.  
>>
>>     I am speaking over my head but obviously DSM-V may oversimplify.
>>
>>     My wife says that the book I mentioned, "Analysis of the Self" by Kohut 
>> is not as good as "Borderline Conditions and Pathological Narcissism" by 
>> Otto Kernberg.
> 
> 
> 

-- 
☣ uǝlƃ

.-. .- -. -.. --- -- -..-. -.. --- - ... -..-. .- -. -.. -..-. -.. .- ... .... 
. ...
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ 

Reply via email to