Roger, I am aware they these agents are not interested in fixing the problem. As a high volume participant on Github, I wish to speak with some authority that the actions these agent pursue betray a misunderstanding of git workflow. The goal it seems is to project the facebook/youtube comments model onto the github issues model. In addition, their criticism is invalid exactly because one can fork the repo and perform verification themselves. Thus the objection, if taking seriously, betrays a misunderstanding of git workflow. If you take the time, as I had, to investigate the individuals on this post you will find that some have as many as 93 repos and that they are ALL forked! For Nick, this means that the repos were written by another party.
Further, you say, " the conservative troll manifesto: corruption is inevitable". Perhaps then, I should be considered a troll. I very much expect to maintain code, to build immunities to malevolent agents and measure the corruption embodied in any social program. This much seems reasonable. I ask about other git-based *social **media*, like bitbucket, exactly because it would be good to know if this is a failing of Microsoft (who purchased Github for 7.5 Billion dollars last year). Jonathan Zingale
.-. .- -. -.. --- -- -..-. -.. --- - ... -..-. .- -. -.. -..-. -.. .- ... .... . ... FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
