That's convincing, Jim. I also vote "no". I'd like to know what the mission is, even if it's only to fold and disperse the funds.
On 6/8/20 10:21 AM, James J Anderson wrote: > I agree with Steve that bringing attention to SDG is not a very useful > result. Even if there is a way for Netlogo to acknowledge a $10k donation, a > link to the existing Swarm website is not going to impress. In particular, if > we do decide to be absorbed into an active organization, what is the value of > shining attention to SDG if it then disappears? > > As we go forward to extinction or invigoration might we first consider our > assets and how they might be leveraged to some purpose. The only tangible > asset is the $40K in the bank. Intangible assets are a shared history and > disjoint but overlapping activities in ABM. Splitting up the funds is the > easy part, Making more of SDG requires a vision, agreement and individual > commitments of time. But I don't see that we can do all this before the end > of the voting period. We have created a false deadline for ourselves. > > I vote no for this round. > > I do hope we can revisit Steve's proposal after we have some better > resolution of the future of SDG. -- glen ep ropella 971-599-3737 .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
