Ah yes, the views of the racists and traitorous confederates..

From: Friam <[email protected]> on behalf of Prof David West 
<[email protected]>
Reply-To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[email protected]>
Date: Friday, June 12, 2020 at 2:47 PM
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: [FRIAM] tactics and strategy - from vFRIAM 6/12 - attention glen

context:

near the end of vFRIAM, SteveG argued that Science's denigration and dismissal 
of God and religious sensibilities in general was both arrogant (on the part of 
Science) and divisive / counter-productive. In an attempt to steelman SteveG's 
position I generalized the argument and made the assertion that this element of 
the Liberal Democratic strategy to defeat Trump was not only 
counter-productive, but extremely stupid. I also expanded the scope of SteveG's 
argument away from simply religion but to all the views that might be held by 
those in Hillary's "basket of deplorables."

glen wishes to 'discuss' my assertion.

How to proceed? from the general to eventual specifics/particulars? who goes 
first?

davew

- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ 

Reply via email to