I don't think free will is bound with (naive) morality at all. It's all about selection
functions. Do I turn this way or that. Do I eat some food, go for a run, or read a book.
So, I don't see it as "importing" anything. Free will is all about which things
are bound and which things are free (and which things are partially bound ...
constrained).
On 6/15/20 2:21 PM, Jon Zingale wrote:
It seems that the subject of free will is completely bound
up in the subject of moral responsibility (especially
historically), and often more narrowly bound up with the
concept of /good-evil/ dualism. [...] Why do we want to import the technology
of free
will, and to what application do we find it useful?
- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
