Yes, exogenous is better. It seems like we are in agreement that something higher-order is needed, an algebra or otherwise. In regards to truncation, I am again thinking about the Gisin paper and staying open to the idea that we wouldn't need to amend the model but rather the underlying logic to accommodate. Whatever model we choose, a truncation property is likely to be unsatisfying over a boolean topos and without developing a concept like computational observability. For now, I am thinking of truncation interpretation as a separate problem.
I will have to think more carefully about your point regarding distributions and the Markov property. I am not sure that the model is Markovian in that there is memory bound up in the stigmergy. -- Sent from: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
