I think that's the essence of Jon's idea. But there is a refinement we could 
make. Oracles don't have to be embodied in a person(ality). In some ways, 
Gisin's idea of distant digits in real numbers or a random process are 
non-personal oracles by some definition. Deterministic sensitivity to initial 
conditions and fractal dimension might be other members of the same class.

On 7/8/20 7:12 AM, Roger Critchlow wrote:
> But maybe it's exactly the inexplicability which is the secret sauce, that 
> there is something ineffable about the quantum physics.
> 
> -- rec --
> 
> 
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 9:51 AM ∄ uǝlƃ <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
>     5) evocation of the shaman/oracle archetype

-- 
☣ uǝlƃ

- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ 

Reply via email to